I recall that she insisted the voice in circulation was not hers. I recall that she maintained she never spoke with me. I recall that she categorically stated she did not know anyone by the name of Prof. Mgbeke

I recall that she insisted the voice in circulation was not hers. I recall that she maintained she never spoke with me. I recall that she categorically stated she did not know anyone by the name of Prof. Mgbeke I recall that she insisted the voice in circulation was not hers. I recall that she maintained she never spoke with me. I recall that she categorically stated she did not know anyone by the name of Prof. Mgbeke

I recall that she insisted the voice in circulation was not hers. I recall that she maintained she never spoke with me. I recall that she categorically stated she did not know anyone by the name of Prof. Mgbeke

I also recall that she and her paid, and in my view, utterly useless mouthpieces alleged that I paid individuals to alter, clone, or use artificial intelligence to generate her voice.

These contradictions raise fresh and fundamental questions.If sensitive issues, information, and even classified documents relating to her and others are now entering the public domain, what exactly is Natasha Akpoti afraid of? Can she lawfully or morally prevent me from speaking at my own time, and in my own style? The answer is no.

Governor Oborevwori set to clear pensions payments backlog – EAC Latimore

I challenge her to stop me from stating the facts as they are. Truth may be uncomfortable for those who thrive on falsehood, but truth comes with evidence, not empty rhetoric.

This is someone who laughed while reputations were being shredded. She took pleasure, directly or indirectly, in actions that left other people’s wives and children in tears.

She appeared unbothered as she made grave and damaging allegations without a shred of credible proof and freely deployed derogatory language to describe others.
Today, however, she appears deeply unsettled now that her own words, actions, and records are surfacing in the open. Is that not hypocrisy? Is that not narcissism? Is that not cruelty dressed up and marketed as power and influence? She has left in her wake broken homes, strained families, and damaged careers, only to rebrand all of this as “ambition”.

She weaponised gender, emotions, and public sympathy, then turned around to demand immunity from scrutiny and accountability.

My position is straightforward: there must be consequences for every offence allegedly committed by Natasha Akpoti and all who enabled her.

She must either face prosecution under the law or offer a clear, unreserved public apology to everyone she has wronged.

 

There is no moral justification for her conduct, her actions, her show of arrogance and perceived lawlessness, her false accusations, or her sponsored smear campaigns, including those allegedly targeted at me and my children.

There is equally no legal justification, because wrongdoing does not become right through repetition, deception, manipulation, lies, propaganda, or noise.

http://Worshipper beaten to death on Osun mosque premises https://tribuneonlineng.com/worshipper-beaten-to-death-on-osun-mosque-premises/

Abuse does not acquire legitimacy simply because it is loudly defended or cleverly packaged.

No one has the right to destroy others and then cry foul when the truth emerges.

Truth does not panic.

Truth does not beg.

Truth stands firm, in all seasons and under all pressures.

 

Prof. Mgbeke